Moderator leads a formal review process - Test processes

Q.  Who leads a formal review process?
- Published on 13 Aug 15

a. Author
b. Moderator
c. Reviewer
d. Scribe

ANSWER: Moderator
 

    Discussion

  • Prajakta Pandit   -Posted on 05 Nov 15

    - Moderator leads a formal review process.

    - Formal review is a well structured and regulated.

    - It follows a formal process.

    - Formal review process steps :

      - 1. Planning
      - 2. Kick-off
      - 3. Preparation
      - 4. Review meeting
      - 5. Rework
      - 6. Follow-up

    1. Planning : This is the first phase of the formal review. This phase is begins with a request for review by the author to the moderator. A moderator has take care of the scheduling like date, time, place and invitation of the review.

    2. Kick-off : This is an optional step in a review procedure. The main goal of this step is to give short introduction on the objectives of the review and the documents to everyone in the meeting.

    3. Preparation : In this phase, reviewers review the document individually using the related documents, procedures, rules and checklists provided.

    4. Review meeting : The review meeting consists of three phases :
      - 1. Logging phase : In this phase, the issues and the defects that have been identified during the preparation step are logged page by page.

      - 2. Discussion phase : If any issue needs a discussion then the item is logged and handled in the discussion phase.

      - 3. Decision phase : At the end of the meeting a decision on the document under review has to be made by the participants.

    5. Rework : In this phase, if the number of defects found per page exceeds the certain level, then the document has to be reworked.

    6. Follow-up : In this phase, a moderator check to make sure that the author has taken action on all known defects.

Post your comment / Share knowledge


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above image, reload the page to generate a new one.)